Sebastian Zearing

how to be progressive without being a stupid liberal

Tag Archives: Compare & Contrast

Compare & Contrast: Genetically Modified Organisms

This post was originally published at liberateandconserve.wordpress.com.

Genetically modified organisms are any lifeforms (typically plants, animals, or bacteria) that have had their genome changed via a technical method, as opposed to selection. The goal in genetic alteration can be anything, but the controversy regarding GMOs typically concerns their usage as food. GMOs can be engineered to have higher yields, faster maturation, more nutritive content, better resistance to pests, etc.

From theĀ introduction:

The liberal worldview, as currently conceived in America, holds that humans, in their natural state, are equal in character, virtue, intelligence, beauty, aptitude, and worth, and that actualizing that equality constitutes the noblest political pursuit. Entwined in the worldview is the perspective that the natural is essentially good, and that actions to change the natural constitute corruption, and not improvement.

Read more of this post

Compare & Contrast: Sexual Liberation

This post was originally published at liberateandconserve.wordpress.com.

Sexual liberation was the movement to legalize all forms of consensual extramarital (particularly heterosexual) sex (i.e. premarital sex and open marriages), usage of contraceptives, all forms of consensual sexual practices (i.e. sodomy), and softening of the measures delivered to adulterous spouses. This movement was completed during the 1960s and 1970s, though attitudes persist till today. Sexual liberation is linked to abortion and women’s liberation, but those will be separate posts.

From the introduction:

The liberal worldview, as currently conceived in America, holds that humans, in their natural state, are equal in character, virtue, intelligence, beauty, aptitude, and worth, and that actualizing that equality constitutes the noblest political pursuit. Entwined in the worldview is the perspective that the natural is essentially good, and that actions to change the natural constitute corruption, and not improvement.

Read more of this post

Compare & Contrast: Gay Rights

This post was originally published at liberateandconserve.wordpress.com.

I’ll be using a compare-and-contrast template to analyze various political issues where there is a liberal/conservative divide. I’ll use the definitions of liberalism and conservatism I gave in my introductory post. This is the first post in the series.

The issue of gay rights is the issue pertaining to the legal treatment of gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals, gay and lesbian relationships, homosexual behavior, and discrimination against gay, lesbian, and bisexual people. Gay rights are concerned with recognition of same-sex relationships (such as same-sex marriage), non-discrimination against GLBs[1], legalisation and equal treatment of homosexual behavior (such as age of consent equality), and other pertinent issues like government funding for AIDS research.

From the introduction:

The liberal worldview, as currently conceived in America, holds that humans, in their natural state, are equal in character, virtue, intelligence, beauty, aptitude, and worth, and that actualizing that equality constitutes the noblest political pursuit. Entwined in the worldview is the perspective that the natural is essentially good, and that actions to change the natural constitute corruption, and not improvement.

Read more of this post